I have to warn you up front.
This isn’t going to be one of those comfortable easy blog posts, where you just nod along, agree with the author on every point, then retweet it and go about your life unchanged.
This post will challenge your thinking about the world. It will probably make you uncomfortable at several points. That’s a good sign – it means you’re stepping outside your comfort zone, which leads to growth.
My goal is to make you think. I don’t want you to agree with me on every point. That would be just as useless as you deciding that I’m wrong before you even hear what I have to say – it would stop you from growing. Instead, I’d like you to keep an open mind, and think about what I say.
Buckle in and keep your eyes on the road – this will be a wild ride.
Gravity is just a belief
I’ll get right in the thick of it. Gravity is just a belief.
If you think I’m a lunatic for thinking gravity isn’t real, you’ll be pleasantly surprised. Because I’ll give you even more reason to believe I’m a complete lunatic. I believe the concept of “real” itself is meaningless.
But I’m getting ahead of myself…
Gravity is simply an explanation you believe for things you observe.
Now I’m not going to dispute that it’s a very, very good explanation. But it’s still just an explanation. And to make a point, here’s an alternative explanation for gravity. Yes, there is such a thing:
First imagine that there are only two objects in the whole universe. A penguin, and a ball:
There is no gravity. But they both keep expanding. Say, doubling every hour. So after a while the universe looks like this:
Everything in the penguin expands, including its brain cells. So as far as the penguin is concerned, it has stayed the same size and so has the ball. But the ball has come closer to the penguin.
In other words, the penguin observes the exact same thing as if gravity was present. And if it tries to kick off from the ball, sooner or later it will come crashing back down (because its speed is constant, while the expansion grows geometrically.)
Gravity is just one explanation for what you observe every day.
Have I got you thinking yet? Good…
What is a belief, exactly?
A belief is a generalization for what you observe.
Just like gravity is a belief, you hold other beliefs about the world: “the world is a friendly place”, or “all salesmen are scammers”, or “I suck at maths”…
And just like gravity, all those are just beliefs based on evidence you have observed. Pay attention, this a key point:
A belief is your best explanation of the world, based on your current evidence.
That evidence can be direct (like for gravity), or indirect (I can’t directly observe hydrogen and oxygen, but I trust the people who tell me they exist).
Here’s the thing – the world is just a meaningless jumble of atoms. There is no “dog” or “car” in reality, just a bunch of atoms flying around.
Humans create meaning. We notice patterns in the world, and assign them meaning. In other words, EVERYTHING you think of as “reality” is just a belief.
A better question to ask about beliefs – are they useful?
Instead of asking if a belief is “true”, (which is a meaningless construct), ask if it is useful to you.
The point of this post is this: Your beliefs are only beliefs. You can choose to hang on to them, or change them.
Once you let go of this concept of “real”, and treat belief as beliefs, you can let go of them.
And to finish off, let me share one last example of choosing useful beliefs:
Back when the Wright Brothers were inventing the airplane, the conventional wisdom was “Things heavier than air can’t fly.” Newspaper reporters refused to even come and look when the Wright Brothers told them they had a working airplane.
The Brothers ignored the conventional belief. Instead, they realized a more useful belief would be “Things heavier than air stay on the ground, unless you apply enough upward force to counteract gravity.”
And look where it got them!
(photo courtesy of zarajay)
###
How to Eliminate Limiting Beliefs:
I was going to include a section on eliminating limiting beliefs. But it got so ridiculously long (read: thorough) that I decided to make it a separate post.
So stay tuned. How to Eliminate Limiting Beliefs – coming this Friday, to a friendly blog near you



{ 41 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi!
Since you took the time to reach the comment section, here’s some bonus content for you!
1. Beliefs about beliefs
Notice how in the last section, I framed beliefs as “just beliefs, as opposed to ‘reality’”? This in itself is a belief.
It leads to an even higher-order meta-belief: “I can choose my beliefs.” – I believe this to be a very useful belief to have, which is why I subtly sneaked it into the article
2. I know my penguin-and-ball example is full of crap
Shortly before this post, I got caught by a sentence (which I since deleted). Originally, the article said ” (…) the ball has come closer to the penguin. At an increasing rate.”
I decided to check the maths. Verdict – I’m full of shit.
The ball moves closer to the penguin… but at an ever decreasing rate!
(Warning: Maths ahead!)
If we let the ball and the penguin be the same size and start 10 penguin-lengths apart, after each unit of time, they will be this close to each other:
0: 10 penguin-lengths
1: 4.5 penguin-lengths (the penguin has doubled in size, so the 9 original penguin-lengths is now only 4.5 penguin-lengths from its perspective)
2: 1.75 penguin-lengths
3: 0.325 penguin-lengths
4: They’ve collided by this point.
So, yeah. I was wrong. I couldn’t think of another good example that would fit as nicely as the gravity one, so I decided to leave it there.
(I could pretend this was in line with “making you think”. But nah, I decided to be honest
.)
If you’re really uncomfortable with me using that example, imagine I used the solar system example instead.
You can believe the Sun is the centre of the solar system. Or you can believe the Earth is the centre of the solar system.
Both of the above are equally correct and consistent. But putting the Sun at the centre makes predicting future positions of planets much easier. Which makes it a more useful belief.
Have you read Michael Shermer’s book “Why People Believe Weird Things?” Fascinating book. And he’s got a reason for why smart people believe weird things too. The basic idea is summed up by “Smart people believe in weird thing because they’re good at thinking up smart reasons for those beliefs.”
Hmm, stole my wind. I started thinking of air resistance where it seems problematic as well
Besides what would occur if the expanision was of power or exponential nature?
@Keith:
Nope, haven’t read it. Is it really good? Should I add it to my to-read list?
@danman:
Exponential as in “2 to the power of the size of the penguin at previous time step?” That would completely depend on the choice of units, no?
@vlad
I think a power law would be sufficient – this has the advantage of having a non-0 derivative for velocity – as we know , F=ma so we need something like that so that objects on earth’s surface experience a force, i think
exponential … could be some unitless number – an example that pops is discharge of capacitors which has unitless constant -t/RC
Because of (my belief of) the way the mind works, I have to agree with you 100%. However, you can’t logically conclude that the entire universe is pure belief based simply on the failings of the human experience.
Perhaps it is, or perhaps there really are actual truths. I like to believe there are, but as you say, believe is all we can do.
What happens when you come to mathematics? (There’s quite a philosophical divide as to whether we discover maths or invent it.)
Is 1 = 1 a truth or a belief?
I tend to believe that mathematical laws are discovered. There was, is, and for some time in the future, there will only be one me, for example.
we invent mathematics, we discover physics
@danman:
Ah, cool, didn’t think of using a unitless number. That might just work
@StE:
Ah, it’s the old question of whether we invent maths or discover it
.
On that topic, my belief is: “Who cares? It’s fun, so let’s keep doing it!”
I think i found the chief problem with this.
If there are two penguins side by side, jumping up. There is no force on them, just them and earth expanding.
They should either come closer to each other at the same rate as they fall, or the expansion is not uniform w/resp direction
While I didn’t quite understand the ball and penguin example, I do agree with your main point that humans assign meaning. The ball and penguin expand towards each other, but why are they attracted to one another? Isn’t it the rotation of mass that causes gravity? I’m not a science expert, so maybe I’m way off.
But in any event, you’re basically right. People assign meaning to objects and situations. The earth has no usefulness to people if people aren’t around to believe that it is useful.
Likewise, we have all sorts of silly beliefs that hold us back in life. I believe that people are criticizing me when they are not (anxiety), and it holds me back from being more confident and open.
Interesting post – btw I found you through via your guest post at The Change Blog.
@danman:
If the ball is a lot bigger, they won’t even notice how much closer they got to each other compared to the ball. Alternately, if they’re roughly the same size as the ball, they can’t exactly stand “next to each other”. They will stand at an angle. Then again, if they’re roughly the same size as the ball, they would EXPECT to be attracted to each other as much as to the ball!
@Dan:
The example was actually supposed to illustrate that if they’re expanding, they will slowly touch. (And if the penguin tries to push off, they will eventually touch again anyway). Which is the same thing the penguin would observe if there was gravity in his universe.
Also, I take it you liked my guest post. Awesome!
@vlad
Ouch, my stupid. I should have drawn it on paper …
@Vlad
I found it to be a very interesting book that looks into how human beliefs are shaped over time and what causes them to be. Shermer himself is a perfect example of how beliefs can change. He used to be an extremely devout born-again Christian who turned into the founder of the Skeptic Society. I’m subscribed to their E-Skeptic email newsletter and find a lot of their articles interesting. Michael Shermer is also an excellent debater when it comes to Intelligent Design vs Evolution and you can find a lot of his videos on Youtube.
http://www.skeptic.com/
Well i gave it a little more thought.
Distance s = [(L+d) - y]/y where L+d is obviously distance between centres of spheres, and y = f(x) is equation governingg how they grow
you are seeking d**2s/dt**2 = g to make it mimic earth.
i will look into it at home more. just me getting bored in the dept.
What you term as “beliefs” usually start as “perceptions” , which are usually the result of “observations”. An observation forms a perception. Repeated observations resulting in affirming the same perception form a belief about, of , or upon something….
That’s one of the basic things in NLP…. “perceptions shape beliefs, which in turn shape other perceptions….”
So, if one has an open mind, he will just perceive, and not form a belief… therefore, enabling him to become more knowledgable….
Did I make any sense?
If i did, i’d love to know your thoughts on that….
Hi Vlad.
This is a thought-opening point you bring up. A lot of what we take as fact is somewhat perceived. At certain points, we take what we see as perceived, label it fact, and look to move on to the next step we see. Some items are repeatedly tested to show their accuracy, but what you are presenting here certainly is the case.
I’d say some beliefs can be generated too. If I want to believe a certain thing, and look for supporting evidence of it, and put effort towards make it real, it might just become supported enough in my own environment to become real to me.
Haven’t heard an alternate explanation of gravity in a long while.
.-= Armen Shirvanian´s last blog ..Empowering Thoughts And Fearful Thoughts =-.
This is a great post and an enjoyable read. I find it interesting how we often get so caught up in our beliefs that to us they are real. I personally believe reality is no more than a convincing perception. If we perceive something to be real, for all intents and purposes …. it is.
Exactly. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
@Keith:
Alright, I might look into it! I do have a couple of others books I want to read before that, though.
@Salman:
Yeah, makes sense. Of course, your perception will ALWAYS be filtered through your existing beliefs… but taking in new information without trying to create any beliefs at first should be more open-mind-ening, as you say
@Armen:
Ah yeah, the “I WANT TO BELIEVE” approach. I just experienced an example of this myself recently, with this video of the most awesome beard ever! (comes in at 0:21)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=081dHOYY6IE
Even after hearing it’s fake, I still really want to believe
(Watch it, you will understand.)
Update.
It seems to solve this way – r(t) = (L+d)/(0.5gt**2+1+d/L) d being diameter at start and L being length at start.
So our earth increases in size but the expansion is getting smaller and smaller which is a surprising result
Hmmm err’d again. The above makes the separation increase – my assumption about the second derivative is full of shit
i strongly agree Vlad
in most of my blog posts i mention false beliefs and how its important for the person to get rid of them in order to live a better life
@Farouk:
Whoa, whoa, hold your horses, tiger!
You strongly agree and at the same time talk about “false” beliefs? I think you’re missing a crucial bit of my argument.
There is no “true” or “false” with beliefs. Only useful and detrimental.
Though yeah, if we substitute “anti-useful” for your “false”, then we both agree
Maybe it’s gravity that makes my feet get further away with each passing year. It certainly isn’t simply that I’m expanding.
That sounds like a useful belief.
.-= Gabrielle´s last blog ..Sidetracked =-.
What a cute penguin!
And the growth idea is so awesome that it totally stole the spotlight from the post’s other content.
Any kind of accelerating growth (combined with a few other assumptions, or beliefs) really does the trick. Too bad you can’t get it into orbit with that theory. Would have been so cool if it had passed high-school physics.
@Gabrielle:
@Shadowart:
As long as you remember that penguin, I think you will connect it to “everything is a belief” and remember that too. I’d say it was a pretty successful illustration if I manage to get it stuck in your head for a while
In fact my belief is that you are the most wonderful personal development blogger ever. The first personal development post that was not a shit to read. The first personal development post that I read to the end. The first personal development blogger I want to subscribe because he has ideas, not just advice.
.-= Jaky Astik´s last blog ..7 essential startup business basics to master for quick profitability =-.
@Jaky:
Aww, thanks!
I’m not sure what blogs you’ve been reading, because I think there’s plenty of good stuff out there. That being said, I do lean more towards ideas than your average personal development blogger.
I dig through my archives and found this post you might be interested in, it’s about choice:
http://vladdolezal.com/blog/2008/choice/
I’m also planning another big interesting-ideas-rather-than-advice post, but that will be another week or two before I post it
It’s best to align one’s beliefs with objective reality because it is what it is, regardless of what you believe.
Hi Vlad, Just linked into your post from my friend Benny’s article on how he changed his perception towards Parisiens et voila! nothing changed but everything changed.
Just curious if you’re a fan of/acquainted with Illusions by Richard Bach? It’s my fave.
@G:
Nope, never heard of Illusions. What is it?
@Vlad Really! This line had me totally thinking you were a fan: “Your beliefs are only beliefs. You can choose to hang on to them, or change them.”
Bach: “The world is your exercise-book, the pages on which you do your sums. It is not reality, although you can express reality there if you wish. You are also free to write nonsense, or lies, or to tear the pages.”
Go pick up a copy, it’s a short read. Even just based on this post, I think you’d enjoy it a lot and maybe get some good fodder for future ideas and thoughts. I hope so, anyway.
PS. Wow that is SO not my last entry. Lol is there any way to get rid of that?
@G:
Alright, I’ll get a copy when I have the chance!
P.S. I edited that for you. You’re welcome
Ha thanks, much appreciated. That was just…awkward.
Drop me a line when you get it and/or when you’ve finished it; I’ll be eager to hear whatcha think. In the meantime I shall peruse your blog further. It’s nice to “meet” ya!
Instead of asking if a belief is “true”, (which is a meaningless construct), ask if it is useful to you
Great Post
@Ufaq:
Glad you like it!
Belief is your attitude and character. You react and make decision base on your belief.
Bi Sadong´s last post ..Discover the Power of Meridian Tapping- A Revolutionary Method for Stress Free Living Hardcover
Don’t you feel that this concept is one of the most difficult to understand?
I read this entry when it was brand new and now, more than a year from that, I can finally understand it. I’ve read a lot of other articles that talk about the same subject, and I kinda got them, but like week ago I had this discovery moment when I said: oh my!! I finally got it!!
I’m glad I understood this because I believe it’s the base of mind understanding. Cool!
Georgina´s last post ..Sobre los Métodos 3–Solo pero no solitario- autodidacta
You’re absolutely right. This is one of those concepts that you read about and think “Yeah, yeah, sure, I get it.” But you don’t. Not really.
And then, one day, you finally get it and just sit there for a few minutes with your mind blown.
Hmmm… I’m sure there are other concepts like that out there, and I’m sure there’s a way to speed up the mind-blowing process. I’ll have to think about that…
{ 5 trackbacks }